Protest Poetry And Dissident Poetry


For some reason, I decided to re-read bits of a speech that the late great Adrienne Rich had given upon the occasion of being given an award (her remarks were published by Norton as a sort of chapbook under the title  Poetry and Commitment).

She references the American poet James Scully, who (according to Rich)  calls ‘protest poetry’ conceptually shallow, reactive, predictable, and typically featuring hand wringing from the sidelines. She then includes brief quote from Scully:

Dissident poetry, however, does not respect boundaries between private and public, self and other. In breaking boundaries it breaks silences, speaking for, or at best, with the silenced; opening poetry up, putting it into the middle of life… It is a poetry that talks back, that would act as part of the world, not simply as a mirror of it.

This struck me because it came after some conversations with my father about political poetry, or, rather, its relative absence, at least in American poetry. And, of course, the recent passing of Amiri Baraka, the poet formerly known as LeRoi Jones.

Maybe Baraka exemplified best what Rich talks about, being committed.

She defends Shelley’s much maligned line about poets being unacknowledged legislators because Shelley did not know how nor conceived that he could separate his deeply held, liberal political views with his poetry nor that any other poet could. They were all from the same wellspring.

This just all sort of falls when I’m reading a lot of politically minded poetry. I picked some bell hooks the other night and am also reading Diane Di Prima’s Revolutionary Letters and even (though it’s not poetry) Solanas’ SCUM Manifesto (with an obnoxiously long foreword, I might add).

In honor of all this, here’s my terrible, awful attempt at what Scully would rightfully sneer at as protest poetry. He would probably also note that rhyming is not really my strong suit. Well, at least it’s political. I guess. I’ll almost certainly live to wish that I’d burned it, instead.


Rick Scott: An Ode

At last, I come arrayed
In the fanfare of the common cracker man
Humble, tacky but no frayed –
Dispatching notes of great jay
And for your acknowledgement and unhesitating belief, I have prayed.
 
The winnings you have won,
The challenges you have overcome –
Nothing to the great evil I have undone!
 
Tidings of unvarnished truth I bring!
My great employment, great employments wrought.
Corporate friends with good goods come to kiss the sun kissed ring,
Promises kept to a tee – seven hundred thousand on the nose!
My regal and trustworthy success a contrast to the old, faded king.
 
My jealous enemies name me Skeletor™
And cry that my greatest victories I falsely forge
But their spiteful, jealous facts I will ignore!
 
Your tax dollars I have given
To my honest, grafting friends
And for you, eight dollar an hour jobs, promised then forgiven.
No vow was ever truer kept:
Every poor man’s dollar, every corporation’s promise, only slightly riven.
 
And to those shallow, faithless, disbelieving fools who say
I promised you more jobs than just those created by Obama’s daring play,
Do not throw those lying tapes, videos and quotes in my face – nay, I say, nay!

Midweek Meeting – From The Mouths Of Babes


Because it’s what smart people do.

Krausian theater.

The end of brutalist worship in DC.

‘Type Rider II: The Tandem Poetry Tour’ – I know, cool, right?

2014-02-28-typeriderlogo_color011-thumb


tumblr_n09o50FA1G1qclzbio1_1280

Midweek Staff Meeting – My Blood Is Superior


Lotl_-_The_Sleestak_God_002

Just give it up already. You’ll be healthier.

I could write on a train. In fact, I’m pretty sure I already have. So. You know. Call me.

Is poetry not literature, but something else? Was it, but is no longer?

The honest answer is: maybe?

I don’t know. All of them?

What we can learn from Schiller about the beautiful. It’s not mentioned, but Elaine Scarry wrote a great book on beauty, called On Beauty and Being Just and I recommend that. I honestly haven’t read the Schiller book in question. I don’t actually think I’ve read any Schiller, unless you count the chorus to Beethoven’s Ninth. My local public radio station has taken to playing just the second movement of the Ninth. That’s like half a handjob. I mean, yeah, it feels good, but without the finale, I’d really rather you didn’t even start it.

Muriel Rukeyser’s ‘Elegies’


9780811221061She’s a poet I’d read about a lot. For some reason, I thought she was more recent than she is – that she had begun writing more in the fifties and sixties, but the poems that make up Elegies were written in the late thirties and the forties. They are not, strictly speaking, war poems (but, really, how can anything in poetry be definitely said to be anything, strictly speaking; even forms like the sonnet and haiku have been reimagined so that I question whether anything in poetry should be defined strictly), but are inspired (depressed?) by the Spanish Civil War and the Second World War.

I guess that to her contemporaries, she was considered a ‘difficult’ poet, but to the modern ear, it’s hard to hear. She seems quite direct by comparison to much contemporary poetry (which is not a criticism of contemporary poetry; I find J.H. Prynne nearly impossible to suss out, but find his poetry amazing, nonetheless).

There is a strong current of melancholy running through it, which you might expect from an elegy, but they’re not really elegies. They’re dedicated to her lover, who she only knew briefly, before the Spanish Civil War separated them. He died in 1938, but she didn’t know until 1943.

And it’s not a melancholy towards the ravages of war. Or, at least, not exactly (not ‘strictly speaking’).

The first elegy, Rotten Lake. It reminds me of Tolkien. Specifically, the mood behind the end of Return of the King. Not the one you saw in the movie, but the one in the book, where the hobbits return to the Shire and find that Saruman and Wormtongue have turned the beautiful fields and hills of the Shire into an industrial wasteland. A not subtle statement about how Tolkien perceived returning to English country life after the First World War. Rukeyser isn’t mourning pastoralism, but she is saddened by the coarsening, by the decline of a place where memories are strong.

I wanted to quote this bit from the fourth elegy, Refugees:

We bear their smile, we smile under the guilt,
in an access of sickness, “Let me alone, I’m healthy!”
cry. And in danger, the sexually witty
speak in short sentences, the unfulfilled.
While definition levels others out.

What a great phrase, ‘the sexually witty.’ Can’t you visualize it? Powerful, virile, venal, sad.

The sixth, River Elegy, may be my favorite. And not just because it’s the shortest. There is a theme of water (and water being symbolic of sex), but the river comes across in this great propulsivity of language. No formalism here, just thick stanzas of desperate desire, movement, and fear of loss. I would be curious to know when it was written, what was happening in the wars? The elegies that follow are more melancholy, looking over the loss of wars, but this one seems to be still holding out hope. Was it written before she knew for certain her lover had died? After, but digging deep to pull out some hope, or not hope, but desperation. Like a shark, keep moving or the hope dies, but secretly just moving out of fear of stopping. Because the later elegies are more… stopped. In the eight elegy, she writes: I see it pass before me in parade

She is still and the world is moving.


Top-reasons-to-choose-a-print-book-infographic1

The Sunday Newspaper – Dead Poet C–p


Dead Poets Society sucks. That’s not what studying literature is about. But on another note, have you seen that freaking iPad commercial where Robin Williams’ voice from that movie wafts about, reciting and lecturing on Walt Whitman as a means to emphasize the importance of poetry and how poetry makes us human, makes life worth living! I do agree with that sentiment, wholeheartedly, 110%, unabashedly. You name it. But no one in the commercial is doing anything remotely to do with poetry. And they’re all holding iPads, devices which are mainly for consumption of video content. I have an iPad and I actually have some poetry apps on it, but, c’mon. The iPad is about kitten videos, Angry Birds, and mobile pornography. It is emphatically not about poetry. And, despite including that Whitman-esque voiceover, the advertisement does not even remotely try to pretend that the iPad in use has anything to do with poetry! Ack! This is just pissing me off to no end!

Dungeons & Dragons: Part III


The party are met at the Amran docks by a refugee from the empire and guided to meet with two invididuals: an elf named Elimelech and a gnome named Nadab. Elimelech explains that he has been in Amran as an intelligence officer for the Sunward Emperor for five years and Nadab has been working as a merchant, but also passing information to the imperial navy.

A lead takes them to a proto-industrial slum outside the city walls, near the river which, along with the sea port, is the other half Amran’s mercantile dominance. After a few days of surveillance, where they also learn that other, interested parties are also watching them, the party makes their move.

They’re a little late, though. Someone had been minting currency in the name of non-existent empire and using that currency to hide involvement in paying for the invasion of the Sunward Empire. Oh, and the ringleaders transform into humanoid snakes. So, there’s that.

Part I
Part II

dnd_products_dndacc_1eDeitiesDemigods_pic3_en

I’m Watching ‘Outlaw Star’ While The Missus Is Away


Outlaw StarI’ve been taking advantage of some time as a single man to watch DVDs of my favorite bit o’ japanimation: Outlaw Star.

If you’ve never heard of it, don’t worry. I gather it’s not widely known.

So, while walking back from the Kennedy Center (I’d just seen Anna-Sophie Mutter perform), I got myself in the mood to watch an episode or two (out of a total of twenty-six) and thought about the gender roles. Or rather, depictions of women.

The primary female protagonist (Melfina) is typically young, school girlish, and large eyed. Most of the time, she’s little more than that. An innocent, virginal object who desires (and is eventually, but only eventually, desired by) the primary male protagonist (Jean Starwind), in the seventh episode, while she’s still dealing with being a  ‘bio-android’ (I gather, essentially human, but with some subtle differences and also grown artificially, rather than born) and not having the memories to go along with her mental age, she falls asleep on Jean’s shoulder. His young friend, Jim Hawking, hits him on the head with a frying pan in looney tunes fashion, when Jean gets a little, shall we say… fresh with the sleeping Melfina. Jim then cuddles up with her and says, ‘She’s like my mom.’

Never before or again are his parents or how a ten year old (roughly)  boy came to be living with a shiftless twenty-something bounty hunter, but that one little moment sets up a rare and totally contrary way to view Melfina (who is otherwise a generally sisterly figure – until she becomes a lover figure, but even that is portrayed in a somewhat platonic fashion: she and Jean are friends first) and is one of the few times when Jim’s needs as a child are acknowledged.

There is a beautiful assassin named Twilight Suzuka. Actually, that should really just be Suzuka, shouldn’t it? She is beautiful, but towards the very end, she meets the man she most wants to kill… and he is wearing her face. He wears baggy, shapeless, sexless clothes, but without those other signifiers and a masculine voice, her face is perfectly adequate as  a beautiful young man. She also very noticeably avoids the question of whether she loves Jean. She promises an answer later, but never gives it. But why does she stick around?

Well, there we are. I’ve just made a big deal of a sixteen year old cartoon. Whatever. I like it.

Weekend Reading – It Turns Out Entrepreneurs Less Concerned About Tax Rates, More Concerned About Not Living In A Nightmarish, Ayn Rand Fantasy World


This will blow your mind, but entrepreneurs are actually drawn to cities with a high quality of life (read: investments in infrastructure, environment, arts, etc) and a pool of skilled employees (read: investments in education, k-12 and beyond). Not, apparently, the low wage wastelands with low taxes and minimal regulations (read: gutted protections for clean air and water and for labor).

Could. Not. Agree. More.

This is the sort of thing that makes me nostalgic. Bars have gotten louder and cafés have gotten quieter… and each change affects the promise of political change. I can remember when you could have a conversation and even read in a bar. I used to read in bars all the time. Not so much anymore. And how long has it been since a coffeehouse was the site of active discussion? A long time, I bet. I can remember when coffeehouses were far more boisterous, with strangers engaging in conversation. The coffee wasn’t so good, but I was actually okay with that trade off. And it probably promoted entrepreneurship. I just sayin’.

coffeehouseorator_2171774c