20131125-200955.jpg

I’ve Been Seduced By ‘Almost Human’


download (1)I know for certain that my friend Ryan (whose nickname in college was Satan) watches this show. I haven’t spoken to him about it, but he has a pact with his namesake, requiring him to watch every science fiction show and movie that comes out. So surely he’s watched this.

The two leads have good chemistry. The ‘human’ lead I think of particularly fondly, mainly because he was in The Lord of the Rings, playing Eomer. Rather like Kiefer Sutherland, who had such success with the right wing, masturbatory fantasy, 24, Karl Urban is maybe not a big enough presence for movies, but is just right for a television show that aims big.

The little touches of advanced technology that are added in, without detracting from the human element (or human-like elements; after all, the premise is that cops have androids for partners) remind one of William Gibson’s best work.

Anyway. I’m hooked. Along with Castle, this should keep me entertained on my Monday nights.

Midweek Staff Meeting – CPA


Prose-1 (1)Not ‘certified public accountant,’ ‘continuous partial attention,’ the internet affliction.

The god of writers. My totem would be an etching of the prophet Gad, one of the prophets who advised King David. He appears briefly in the Book of Samuel, but there is supposed to be a lost book called ‘The Book of Gad the Seer’ that is mentioned in the Chronicles, but which no one has seen since before… well, a long a freaking time. Gad stopped a plague once, apparently, but really doesn’t have much association with writing. Heck, we don’t even has his book.

We still don’t have a philosopher-king (or philosopher-prime minister, but that’s partly because we don’t have prime ministers in America, which, we possibly should, but that’s another discussion, the advantages and disadvantages of the parliamentary versus presidential systems; could one describe [depict?] Obama as a sort of philosopher-president; maybe, but, as much as he’s mocked as an egghead, he’s really more in the evangelical of the educated preacher, rather than the public intellectual; no, you’d have to go back to founding figures like Thomas Jefferson and James Madison to find our philosopoher-presidents, I think). But I do remember reading Michael Ignatieff’s editorials. I don’t remember being impressed. If I recall, he had kind of a Thomas Friedman thing going on, and, really, for pundits, is there any more grievous insult than being compared to Thomas Friedman. I mean, without getting deep into the downright idiotic chaff, like Ross ‘the neckbeard’ Douthat or ridiculously stupid and offensive figures like Cohen.

A cri de coeur for a return to polymathy. No. Seriously. Which is cool, because I’m probably closer to being a polymath than I am to being a specialist.

Happiness sucks. There. I’ve said it.

I’m just getting started!

Spoiler Alert!


Tom Baker has a surprise appearance in The Day of the Doctor!

Matt Smith was talking, when you could hear a voice behind him. I thought, is that? Could it be? Please!

And there he was!

In a brief little featurette (their word, not mine), Steve Moffatt said something along the lines of ‘There was the Doctor [meaning Matt Smith, the actor currently playing the Doctor] and then there’s THE DOCTOR [meaning Tom Baker, who is still the gold standard and really, the person you mean, or the person you should mean, when you talk about ‘The Doctor’ in singular] walking up behind him.’

This is the first time Tom Baker has appeared in a Doctor Who episode since leaving the show (in stories like The Five Doctors, he declined to participate and stock footage was used to explain away his absence).

504x_tom-baker1

 

C.S. Lewis Just Died


C.S._LewisWell, we just had the anniversary of his death, if you want to nitpick. The fiftieth anniversary to be precise.

So… read this stuff I wrote about C.S. Lewis last year.

coffeephilosopher.com/2012/11/29/happy-birthday-c-s-lewis/

Monday Morning Staff Meeting – It’s A Comic Novel


imagesMental illness diagnostics as parody.

A conservative looks at the liberal critic’s critique of liberalism.

Ok, this is a rather neat bit of rambling, informal essay. An old fashioned sort of essay really. Sort of nineteenth century. But the idea of disassociation from process, which the author links to his relationship with music and the act of setting the needle on the record compared to the act of activating purely aetherially stored music on the world wide interwebs cloud.

The Sunday Paper – Subversives


Jean-Paul Sartre
Jean-Paul Sartre

The greatest threat to the American way of life? French philosophers, of course!

How does one write a proof of God?

The Elgar code.

For a while there, I was writing letters on my typewriter (a green, Smith-Corona portable form the sixties), but circumstances have made that physically difficult (it’s a long story; suffice to say that access to the machine is limited, at present). One of the first was a letter to Alvin Plantinga after reading the first book in his Warrant ‘trilogy’ and realizing that everything I had been taught about Plantinga’s concept of warrant was terribly, terribly wrong.

Weekend Reading – A Place For The Soul


Milton thought that books made better receptacles for human souls than bodies.

The innocence of 1939.

What is he worth? Who decides?

‘The Bell Jar’ By Sylvia Plath (New Year’s Resolution, Book Thirty-Nine)


I almost bought this book a month or so ago. I had read a review of a new book about Plath’s time in New York City as a fellow/intern/whatever at Mademoiselle. Unfortunately, when I browsed, all I could find was a copy with a pink cover. I wasn’t ready to go that far.

Fortunately, my mother had a copy at home and mailed it to me. ‘W Honey’ was written in blue ink from a ballpoint pen on the inside cover.

The style initially appears as being Heminway-esqeu; clipped, staccato, declarative.

But rather than being used to express masculinity, Plath uses it to express the first person narrator’s negative emotional affect (and also help establish her as a somewhat unreliable narrator).

The_Bell_Jar_Harper_71When I was younger, guys would talk about this novel in horror. It was boring. A slog. And I’m pretty sure none of us had actually read it.

The famed crack up, when it happens, feels very sudden. Or, at least, it did to me. Is that how such things really happen? That’s an actual question. I don’t know the answer.

Sex is pretty big in this big. Not much of it actually happens, but Esther (the narrator) is constantly thinking about it. Which, I guess, is pretty normal for a nineteen year old.

This is something I have noted in books from and about this period (and also implied in movies), which is an oddly more permissive attitude towards casual sex. A one time, casual encounter seems preferable in the literature. Sex being something to get gotten out of the way and separate from ‘marriageable’ relationships.

Of course, when Esther finally does have sex, it goes tragically and medically wrong (some hemorrhaging due to an unlikely bit of bad luck that requires some emergency treatment). Unlike Hemingway, though, this is emphatically not portrayed a punishment. Rather, it is the culmination of the somewhat bad luck Esther has had trying to get laid for the first time. A couple of failed efforts, ending with some spectacularly bad sex and bad luck.

Monday Morning Staff Meeting – Translating Tradition


downloadStrategizing ways to export Korean writers.

Reading about the bad deeds of good poets never fails to titillate.

Fashioning the self.