The common wisdom is torn on this topic. Memories of Bill Clinton, in his persona as the ‘Comeback Kid,’ are still fresh. Yet pundits and prognosticators look at the disastrous opening weeks of Newt Gingrich’s nascent presidential campaign and want to write him off without delay – and feel they have good reason to do so.
So which is? Are Clintonesque comebacks still viable? Or can we say, more than a year out, that things are over?
I am pondering this because of the whole Haridopolos radio meltdown.
The Republican primary is not until the end of summer next year, more than fourteen months away. How much do missteps and mistakes that happen this early matter?
My suspicion: more than they used to.
People didn’t plug and pay attention as early during the day’s of the great comebacks, but with noughties and the rise of the internet, the people who decide primaries (which have lower turnouts than general elections and attract more ideological voters) are paying attention much earlier.
Haridopolos’ rejection of the Ryan plan (which has become a Republican litmus test), plus his little radio embarrassment, while be replayed over and over again and links will be embedded in countless e-newsletters, tweets, Facebook status updates, and blog posts on conservative sites from now until the primary.
It is, I think, too soon to say that Haridopolos can’t recover, but it is not to soon to suggest that this won’t haunt him from now until the end of the primary, nor is it too soon to say that Haridopolos’ odds of emerging have gone down dramatically. Before, he was the odds on favorite. Now… not so much.