Weekend Reading – iPads & Other Books


The iPad moving into iTextbooks (note: they don’t really call them ‘iTextbooks’ or at least I hope they don’t because that’s just too darn much).

Set aside the iPad and watch this little video about real books. Actually, I guess you could watch it on your iPad, if you wanted.

Lionel Trilling matters because he “stood for the principle that society and politics cannot be understood without the literary imagination.”

Midweek Staff Meeting – Montmartre Edition


Though my high school buddies and I singularly failed to recreate the creative and artistic atmosphere of the cafe culture in Paris from 1900-1929 at a series of diners and coffeehouses in Florida in the early nineties, at least we can read about the real thing.

‘Live Like a Poet’

Do writers intend to by symbolic?

Vienna was cool, too.

Remind me again, what was Modernism about?

It wasn’t about forgery, was it?

Of course, if literature has died again, it might not even matter.

Tuesday Morning Staff Meeting – Is That My Tidal Basin?


We have a tidal basin in DC, but I can’t figure out if this published here or not.

Conservatives don’t really trust ‘the people.’ The rich know better.

Vaclav Havel never stopped being an artist-intellectual.

Amazon is still coming for your children but publishers are hoping that Barnes & Noble will protect our children from Jeff Bezos.

Monday Staff Meeting – The Parents Are Fighting


Anis Shivani says teaching creative writing is bad.

Karen Babine calls him out as sexist.

My own two cents:
Shivani is kind of a douche. I was very irritated by this sentence – ‘Literature as we have known it through history springs from genius — that most politically incorrect of words.‘ – and it went downhill for me from there.

It’s the kind of macho posturing I hate. It’s a variation of ‘I just tell it like it is.‘ Whenever someone says that, you know they’re about to be a real a–hole.

It’s also that faux rebelliousness. I’m a rebel. I’m out there. I’m going to say stuff you won’t like because I’m such a freaking independent thinker.

And all that for ‘genius.’ Really? That’s your anti-politically correct statement? Great literature partakes of genius? No one considers this politically correct, you’re trying to make yourself sound cool by pretending you’re saying something politically incorrect.

The whole issue of what is and isn’t politically incorrect is just stupid anyway. ‘Genius’ is not politically incorrect. In fact, I think you’ll find that most politically incorrect stuff you hear is better classified as racist stuff.

Thursday Morning Staff Meeting – The Avant Garde


Just a reminder as to why we need independent bookstores, in case you forgot.

This reviewer found himself an excuse to compare the competition between the French and American avant-gardes.

God bless Kenneth Goldsmith for reading his conceptual, avant-garde, experimental (or whatever else you want to call it) to the Obamas.

I’ve never heard of this guy before, but I trust The Nation and so will say that we should all start reading him, also because he sounds interesting.

Mid Week Staff Meeting – Haley Barbour Not Completely Wrong About Everything


Haley Barbour makes one of the few decent decisions of his life and names Natasha Trethewey Mississippi’s Poet Laureate.

Newt Is Not Going To Win Florida Tomorrow


That’s really all I have to say. He’s not going to win. Even a last minute surge won’t help him because of Romney’s advantage in early votes. If you’ve been paying attention, this really shouldn’t be new.

There’s no question that Republican Party tends to be more hierarchical in practice than the Democratic Party. That’s not a necessarily a criticism nor is it a statement of across the board, in every circumstance fact. It’s a tendency or a trend, if you will.

Well, the hierarchy has (somewhat unenthusiastically) settled Romney as ‘next in line.’ There have been some bumps in the road and no one really likes Romney all that much, but that’s how it is people.

Romney was chosen a while back and things have almost finished falling into place for him.

Please return to your daily lives.

Monday Morning Staff Meeting – Luther Was An Early Adopter


Martin Luther, zealot, reformer, revolutionary… blogger?

The e-book is never finished.

What is neo-chartalism? Funny you should ask…

Play ‘Greek Mythology Punishments’ for fun and edification (but not for the graphics).

Sunday Book Review – Is There No More Bad Poetry?


Seth Abramson has nothing but nice things to say about every poet he reads.

Ralph Fiennes reads amateur erotic fiction in his pajamas. Not kidding.

Who here actually though Connie Mack IV was running his accomplishments?

Mad Love


In case you were worried, I am not writing about some future rom-com starring the latest pretty blonde actress, but rather Andre Breton’s meditation on… well, what?

On Jacqueline Lamba, a painter and also Breton’s second wife?

Sort of. But to my mind, not really.

Certainly, she is an object of desire. And that’s the real focus, desire and desire’s object. And sometimes, the fading of desire for the object.

Lamba is less clearly to focus here in Mad Love than the titular Nadja was the focus of Nadja. Mad Love is also much more autobiographical. In fact, it’s not a novel in the way Nadja is. It’s poetry, prose, prose poetry, and a running commentary on desire.

Certainly, it picks up where Nadja left off, with the convulsive nature of beauty.

But Lamba doesn’t even appear until a third of the way into the book. Before that, boding poorly for the couple’s future, Breton is walking with the sculptor Alberto Giacometti and suddenly Breton must purchase this spoon he finds in a market, but then later admits to losing most of his interest in it.

A short read and easier to understand than Nadja and more easily enjoyable to read than a full collection of his poetry, it’s a great introduction to the writing of the leading surrealist.

The forms range from the dreamy, gauzy prose of Nadja to more manifesto-like writing (he did write the two manifestos of the surrealist movement, after all) to actual poems inserted whole cloth within the book.

This bouncing between forms goes to the point of how this book is not about Lamba in the same way that Nadja was about Nadja. If I were to say what it is about, I would come down on the side of it being an aesthetic manifesto. Breton was always the most dogmatic of the surrealists, expelling from the movement those he felt betrayed the values and politics (surrealism was closely tied to the pro-communist left) set down (and generally set down by Breton), so it is hardly a surprise  that this work would so often take that form.