Weekend Reading – Ignore The Man Behind The Book


There is no conceptualism!

Memorializing the dead through conceptualist poetry/art.

And now for some Dungons and Dragons humor…

bard-demotivator

Weekend Reading – Gone, Baby, Gone


Bookstores we have known.

Hayek and Rand – Nietzsche’s unloved offspring.

Free or not, mandatory minimums are stupid.

When the National Review trashed Ayn Rand for being stupid and a terrible writer.

The plight of the cultural producer.

Midweek Staff Meeting – Another One Bites The Dust


iPod sound quality sucks.

Attacking outsider art.

The lost art of memorizing poetry.

Tom Friedman is a demented, Ayn Rand wannabe with a veneer pseudo-liberalism.

‘The Renaissance’ By Walter Pater (New Year’s Resolution, Book Twenty-Nine)


photo-1Walter Pater’s Renaissance is a collection of essays mostly, though, oddly, not exclusively, on topics related to the Renaissance. The introduction (by Arthus Symons) acknowledges Pater as being among the second tier of nineteenth century British prose stylists and historians, but still worth reading. He’s basically right. This book is a light and airy pastry, dusted with fine sugar. Delicious and sweet, but quickly dispatched and and forgotten (except should one see it again on the shelf, in which case some fond memories might re-emerge).

An effort is made by Pater to recognize some of the lesser lights and aspects of the time. Botticelli, for example (who is only lesser in comparison to Michelangelo, Da Vince, and Raphael), and some French writers and literature. A sort of aesthetically minded humanism unites his writings, but there is little enough that passes for a thesis in any of the essays. He tries to find something new to say about the works of the artists, but he never quite settles nor properly explains it. For example, there’s something he wants to say about the poetry of Michelangelos’s statues or how the art of poetry is somehow expressed in them (while failing to say much about the rather good poetry that Michelangelo happened to write), but I don’t really know what it is that he wants to say.

Excepting an author’s conclusion, the final essay is the best. It is also not about the Renaissance. It’s about Johann Joachim photo-3Winckelmann, an eighteenth century art critic/historian who wrote about Greek art and literature. It’s the longest essay and a real passion comes through. For Pater, I think, Winckelmann represents a scholarly ideal that critics like himself should strive to emulate. Winckelmann’s love for the Greeks is well captured by Pater. This essay, I could see myself going back and reading again.

Overall, Pater is no Ruskin. But it’s a reminder that the great nineteenth century essayists were pretty wonderful. Makes one adopt a sort of declinism when thinking about the modern essayist (who is, often, really a humorist).

Finally, there is an inscription:

M J Hutchins
July, 1920

This book was gifted nearly a century.photo-2

Weekend Reading – Walk Around In Circles (A Sop To All You Soul Coughing Fans)


When the right angle killed the circle.

Why are we assuming they’ve been ruined?

Whither Mew?

Happy Monday


538780079_29a2fb237f_o.jpg.CROP.article920-large


20130710-200007.jpg

Weekend Reading – How Far Would You Go For A Poem?


Would you spill your own guts for it?

The message within the gibberish.

Hamlet‘s law.

Postmodern


6a00e54ef86de9883400e54f9e761f8833-800wi

Inside the Printing Studio Where Obsolete Tech Will Never Die