For some reason, pastoral poetry has been in my thoughts these last couple of years. It’s genesis, I put down to my (re)discovery of Wordsworth a while back.
But much of what I’ve written here was been somewhat critical of contemporary pastoral poetry. I tentatively agreed with the idea that pastoral poetry that does not also participate in a certain eco-poetic-politics is insufficient – the idea that it is not enough to write about the nature when so many dangers to it exist. The example given (not by me) was that it is insufficient to write about the songbird and not about the bulldozer nearby that threatens it. Adam Johnson called it “ecological orientalism.”
I have also jumped on the bandwagon of those who look at W.S. Merwin and see someone whose writing since The Lice and The Carrier of Ladders leave something to be desired. I bring that up because, The Lice, in particular, is such a great example of eco-poetics: pastoral poetry that encompasses the man made dangers threaten the natural world. His more recent writings, while still perhaps good, lack the urgency and conviction of those early eco-poetics. They are, in short, what I find to unpalatable about contemporary pastoral poetry.
But my feelings may change. Even now, I reserve the right to change and evolve.
For example, I used to lump Charles Wright in the same category as Merwin. Wright’s first book was published between The Lice and The Carrier of Ladders, so I think we can safely place them in the same generation of poets. And he has also indulged in his fair share of pastoralisms. But I read him and see someone who, while not writing within the Snyder-esque, deep ecology vein of early Merwin, still finds a way to make his pastoral indulgences relevant. He also gives the aging poet some hope, having not clearly peaked by his forties and continuing to evolve and improve over the years.
I bring this up more to question myself. I am not sure how real the distinctions I make really are and much I am merely justifying unjustifiable prejudice. Because I must be nearly the only person to prefer Wright to Merwin (I know plenty of poets who lean more towards the avant-garde who can’t stand them both and my classically quietist and septagenerian father just loves Merwin and couldn’t care less about Wright).
Oh well. As long as I continue to find Billy Collins offensive, I will know I haven’t completely lost my way.